ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Wow, and I know people with four and five daughters!

Wow, and I know people with four and five daughters!

August 17, 2009 by Brigitte Pellerin 3 Comments

And you know who you are, you beautiful women you. That’s not just me saying it, it’s actual science:

However, it’s not just the propensity of attractive women to have more kids that is pumping beautiful genes into the female pool. The fairer among us also tend to conceive more daughters than sons. In a government-backed study of 15,000 Americans, the most good-looking couples were 26 per cent less likely to have boys. Evolutionary psychologists Alan Miller and Satoshi Kanazawa explain this trend in in their 2007 book Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters. In part, the sex of a child is dependent, they argue, on the traits its parents have that are most beneficial to survival. And because being good-looking is a more significant factor in the reproductive success of women than men, it follows that pretty people would have more girls.

OK, now I’m ready for a study that says smarter people are more likely to have boys. Wouldn’t that start a nice fight?

__________________________

Véronique – who has 4 very good looking daughters –  is glad to be improving the gene pool. It was nothing at all. Really. You are all welcome.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. DD says

    August 17, 2009 at 11:53 am

    Actually, real science (by which I mean studies published in journals like Science) has already shown that girls are smarter than boys, too. They’re as good at math as boys and better at reading skills.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/may/30/schools.uk1

    I also hate to be the stick-in-the-mud that points out that appearance is a multigenic trait dependent on the contributions of both parents, so there is no way to expect a gene (or genes) that would somehow affect the success rate of X-chromosome-carrying sperm (which would make the trait dependent on the father, not the attractive mother, and can probably be ruled out) or the successful birth of a female child would consistently segregate together.

    And it looks like their research was discredited anyway:

    http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/kanazawa.pdf

    “In fact, however, this pattern can be explained as a pure
    statistical artifact”

    Reply
  2. SarahB says

    August 17, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    Yeah, it sounded a bit dubious, but as someone who’s given birth to only daughters I rather liked the idea 🙂

    Reply
  3. Matthew N says

    August 17, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    I love how speculation on the meaning of statistical results passes for science these days. Any story that can fit the numbers passes muster. I wish I got paid to do that! 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A new website by women for women
  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Are most Canadians pro-choice?
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Busting the 3 biggest myths on the government funding of abortions
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • Trudeau can call abortion a right but that won't make it true
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2018 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in