If their ideology can’t withstand people thinking about what that ideology actually involves, how secure are they in their position?
Ken Epp, writing about Bill C-484 here. The ideologically strident are aware that the current pro-choice status quo rests on not thinking about “the abortion situation” too much (and constantly putting things like “unborn victims” in quotation marks, as if it were a laughable possibility rather than reality.)
This is why all the screaming begins for bills that don’t even pertain directly to abortion. How secure is their position? Not very.by